Two Verification Paths
Complementary, not competing.
ZK Proofs (VEL-T1-01)
Trustless cryptography
The matching engine computed the correct output — mathematically, without trusting any hardware or operator.
Trust model: No hardware trust required. Pure math.
Status: Research design only. The current default prover is a placeholder.
○ Target: no hardware dependency
○ Target: publicly verifiable inputs and proofs
✗ Computationally expensive to generate
✗ Requires ZK-compatible circuit design
TEE Attestation (VEL-T1-04)
Hardware trust
Target design: an attestation would bind a measured binary to supported AMD SEV-SNP hardware. This is not active in the deployed demo and would still depend on hardware, firmware, cloud, and verification assumptions.
Trust model: Requires trusting AMD/Intel hardware. Stronger operational trust than software alone.
Status: Simulated records only. No hardware-backed deployment is active.
○ Target: low-latency attestation
○ Requires a supported confidential-compute VM
○ Measurement can bind a binary hash to a report
✗ Requires trusting hardware manufacturer (AMD/Intel)
Current Status
DEVELOPMENT MODE
TEE hardware deployment requires AMD SEV-SNP confidential VMs on Azure, AWS, or GCP. Current deployment (fly.io) uses standard VMs without TEE hardware.
Loading binary hash…
● NOW — Placeholder attestation (binary hash computed)
○ JUNE 2026 — AMD SEV-SNP deployment on Azure Confidential VMs
○ POST-MAINNET — NVIDIA H100 GPU attestation for ZK acceleration
○ FUTURE — Intel TDX support via ROFL framework